Experience of Dexmedetomidine using for intraoperative analgosedation during ophthalmic operations
Background. The aim of the study is evaluate the quality and safety of the sedative effect of anesthesia in ambulant ophthalmic surgery by using continuous intravenous infusion of dexmedetomidine.
Materials and Methods. Patients were randomized into groups by age (old people from 65 to 75 years old, old age 76 years, middle age, young people, children), by gender (men, women). The physical status of patients was assessed using the ASA scale and the dynamics of vegetatic activity by the Kerdo index. Sedation was assessed using the Richmond Sedation Scale RASS.
Results. It was found that the difference in the frequency of adverse effects of the appointment of Dexmedetomidine clearly confirms the need to adjust the dose of Dexmedetomidine, depending on the state of the autonomic nervous system. The use of Dexmedetomidine according to the recommendations made it possible to achieve a safe level of sedation and eliminate side effects in ambulant ophthalmic surgery.
Key words: analgosedation, dexmedetomidine, autonomic nervous system
Authors:
- Khodakovsky Maksym Anatoliyovych. Vinnytsia National Medical University named after M.I. Pirogov, Ukraine.
- Miskova Maria Anatoliyivna. Military Medical Clinical Center of the Central Region, Ukraine.
- Nakhymchuk Anna Pavlivna. Ukrainian Military Medical Academy, Ukraine.
Conclusions:
- Parenteral continuous infusion of Dexmedetomidine provides an effective level of sedation for ambulant ophthalmic surgery and maintaining patient-surgeon contact.
- Safety is confirmed by a low level of critical incidents, no respiratory depression at the target sedation level.
- The patency of the upper airways was better compared to previous experience with propofol.
Literature:
- Annex summary of product characteristics dexdor. Available from: ec.europa.eu/health/documents/community-register/2017/20171208139366/anx_139366_en.pdf
- Gerald O’Daniel, Patrick T. Shanahan. Dexmedetomidine: A New α-Agonist Anesthetic Agent for Facial Rejuvenation Surgery. Aesthetic Surgery Journal. 2006;26(1):35–40. doi:10.1016/j. asj.2005.10.003. Available from: aes.sagepub.com/content/26/1/35
- Amir H. Taghinia, Fred E. Shapiro, Sumner A. Slavin. Dexmedetomidine in Aesthetic Facial Surgery: Improving Anesthetic Safety and Efficacy. Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery. January 2008;121(1):269–276. doi:10.1097/01. prs.0000293879.25009.8d. Available from: journals.lww.com/plasreconsurg
- Fred E. Shapiro. Anesthesia for outpatient cosmetic surgery. Current Opinion in Anaesthesiology. 2008;21(6):704–710. doi:10.1097/ACO.0b013 e328315a6ac
- Nasreen F, Bano S, Khan RM, Hasan SA. Dexmedetomidine used to provide hypotensive anesthesia during middle ear surgery. Indian Journal of Otolaryngology and Head & Neck Surgery. 2009;61(3):205–207. doi:10.1007/s12070–009–0070-y
- Yoo J H, Kim S I, Cho A, Lee S J, Sun H J, Cho H B, Lee D R. The effect of dexmedetomidine sedation on patient and surgeon satisfaction during retinal surgery under sub-Tenon’s anesthesia: a randomized controlled trial. Korean Journal of Anesthesiology. 2015 Oct;68(5):442–448. doi:10.4097/ kjae.2015.68.5.442. Available from: PubMed
- De Nucci A, Scialdone A, Lando G, Monaco G, Cacioppo V, Davies S C, Casalino G, Gemma M. Effectiveness and safety of intravenous dexmedetomidine sedation for ophthalmic surgery under regional anesthesia. European Journal of Ophthalmology. 2022 Sep;32(5):2598–2603. doi:10.1177/11206721211059013. Available from: PubMed
- Kumar C M, Chua A W Y, Imani F, Sehat Kashani S. Practical considerations for dexmedetomidine sedation in adult cataract surgery under local/ regional anesthesia: a narrative review. Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine. 2021;11(1):e112424. doi:10.5812/aapm.112424
- Jones J H, Aldwinckle R. Perioperative dexmedetomidine for outpatient cataract surgery: a systematic review. BMC Anesthesiology. 2020;20:75. doi:10.1186/s12871–020–00994–0
- Ayoglu H, et al. Dexmedetomidine sedation during cataract surgery under peribulbar block. British Journal of Anaesthesia. 2007;99(3):448–451. doi:10.1093/bja/aem18